You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 4 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
This lesson is your essential guide to the structure, timing, and mark allocation of AQA GCSE English Language. Understanding how the two papers are organised — and how marks are distributed across questions — is the foundation of effective exam strategy. Students who know exactly what each question demands, how long to spend on it, and how the marks break down consistently outperform those who simply "know how to write."
AQA GCSE English Language (specification 8700) is assessed through two written exam papers and a Spoken Language endorsement (which is reported separately and does not count towards the grade).
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Specification code | 8700 |
| Number of papers | 2 |
| Total exam time | 3 hours 30 minutes (1h 45m per paper) |
| Total marks | 160 (80 per paper) |
| Grade range | 9–1 |
| Tiering | Untiered — all students sit the same papers |
| Spoken Language | Separately endorsed (Pass, Merit, Distinction) |
Exam Tip: Unlike GCSE Science, English Language is untiered. Every student sits the same paper. This means the full grade range (9–1) is available to everyone. The questions are designed so that lower-ability students can access earlier questions, while later questions — particularly Q4 on Paper 1 and Q4 on Paper 2 — are more demanding and differentiate the highest grades.
Paper 1 tests your ability to read and analyse a literary fiction extract and to produce a piece of creative writing. It is worth 50% of your GCSE.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Title | Explorations in Creative Reading and Writing |
| Duration | 1 hour 45 minutes |
| Total marks | 80 |
| Percentage of GCSE | 50% |
| Source material | One literary fiction extract (Source A) |
| Sections | Section A: Reading (40 marks) + Section B: Writing (40 marks) |
You will be given one extract (Source A) from a work of literary fiction. This could be taken from:
The extract will typically be around 600–800 words. You will be told the title, author, date of publication, and given a brief context note to help you understand the setting.
| Question | Focus | Marks | Assessment Objective | Suggested Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | List 4 things from a specific part of the text | 4 | AO1 | 5 minutes |
| Q2 | How does the writer use language to... | 8 | AO2 | 10 minutes |
| Q3 | How does the writer structure the text to... | 8 | AO2 | 10 minutes |
| Q4 | To what extent do you agree with the statement? Evaluate critically. | 20 | AO4 | 20 minutes |
This is the most straightforward question on the paper. You are directed to a specific section of the text (e.g., lines 1–10) and asked to list four things you learn about a character, setting, or event.
You are directed to a specific section and asked how the writer uses language to create a particular effect (e.g., "How does the writer use language here to describe the storm?").
You are asked how the writer structures the text to interest or engage the reader. This question refers to the whole text, not just a section.
This is the highest-value reading question. You are given a statement about the text (e.g., "A student said: 'The writer makes the reader feel sympathy for the main character.' To what extent do you agree?").
| Question | Focus | Marks | Assessment Objectives | Suggested Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q5 | Creative writing — descriptive or narrative | 40 | AO5 (24 marks) + AO6 (16 marks) | 45 minutes |
You will be given a choice of two tasks. Typically:
| Assessment Objective | Focus | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| AO5 | Content and organisation | 24 |
| AO6 | Technical accuracy (spelling, punctuation, grammar) | 16 |
| Total | 40 |
Exam Tip: AO6 (technical accuracy) is worth 16 out of 40 marks — that is 40% of the writing mark. Never rush your writing. Always leave 5 minutes to proofread. Correcting comma splices, misspellings, and punctuation errors can easily gain 3–5 extra marks.
Paper 2 tests your ability to read, compare, and analyse two non-fiction texts and to produce a piece of transactional writing. It is worth 50% of your GCSE.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Title | Writers' Viewpoints and Perspectives |
| Duration | 1 hour 45 minutes |
| Total marks | 80 |
| Percentage of GCSE | 50% |
| Source material | Source A: one non-fiction text (19th century) + Source B: one non-fiction text (20th/21st century) |
| Sections | Section A: Reading (40 marks) + Section B: Writing (40 marks) |
You will be given two non-fiction texts on a linked theme or topic:
Both sources will be around 500–700 words each. Context notes will be provided.
Exam Tip: Do not panic about the 19th-century text. The language may feel unfamiliar, but the ideas are always accessible. Read slowly, focus on the main argument or viewpoint, and look for the writer's attitude.
| Question | Focus | Marks | Assessment Objective | Suggested Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Choose 4 true statements from a list of 8 | 4 | AO1 | 5 minutes |
| Q2 | Summarise the differences (or similarities) between the sources | 8 | AO1 | 10 minutes |
| Q3 | How does the writer use language in Source A or B? | 12 | AO2 | 12 minutes |
| Q4 | Compare how the two writers convey their different perspectives | 16 | AO3 | 18 minutes |
You are given a list of 8 statements about one of the sources. You must shade the 4 that are TRUE.
You must summarise the differences (or sometimes similarities) between the two sources on a specific aspect.
You are directed to one source and asked how the writer uses language to convey their viewpoint, describe something, or achieve a specific effect.
This is the most demanding reading question on Paper 2. You must compare how the two writers convey their different perspectives on the shared topic.
| Question | Focus | Marks | Assessment Objectives | Suggested Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q5 | Transactional writing — article, speech, letter, essay, or leaflet | 40 | AO5 (24 marks) + AO6 (16 marks) | 45 minutes |
You will be given a statement related to the theme of the reading texts, followed by a specific task (e.g., "Write an article for a broadsheet newspaper in which you argue for or against the motion that...").
The writing mark breakdown is identical to Paper 1:
| Assessment Objective | Focus | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| AO5 | Content and organisation | 24 |
| AO6 | Technical accuracy | 16 |
| Total | 40 |
AQA GCSE English Language uses six Assessment Objectives:
| AO | Description | Where Assessed |
|---|---|---|
| AO1 | Identify and interpret explicit and implicit information; select evidence | Paper 1 Q1; Paper 2 Q1, Q2 |
| AO2 | Explain, comment on, and analyse how writers use language and structure for effect, using relevant terminology | Paper 1 Q2, Q3; Paper 2 Q3 |
| AO3 | Compare writers' ideas and perspectives, as well as how these are conveyed, across two or more texts | Paper 2 Q4 |
| AO4 | Evaluate texts critically and support this with appropriate textual references | Paper 1 Q4 |
| AO5 | Communicate clearly, effectively, and imaginatively; select and adapt tone, style, and register; organise information and ideas, using structural and grammatical features | Paper 1 Q5; Paper 2 Q5 |
| AO6 | Use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures for clarity, purpose, and effect; use accurate spelling, punctuation, and grammar | Paper 1 Q5; Paper 2 Q5 |
Exam Tip: Each reading question tests a SPECIFIC assessment objective. Understanding which AO each question targets tells you exactly what the examiner is looking for. For example, Q3 on Paper 1 is AO2 (structure), so you MUST discuss structural choices — not just language.
Time management is one of the biggest differentiators between students who achieve their potential and those who do not. Here is the recommended breakdown for each paper:
| Activity | Time | Running Total |
|---|---|---|
| Read Source A carefully | 10 minutes | 10 min |
| Q1: List 4 things (4 marks) | 5 minutes | 15 min |
| Q2: Language analysis (8 marks) | 10 minutes | 25 min |
| Q3: Structure analysis (8 marks) | 10 minutes | 35 min |
| Q4: Critical evaluation (20 marks) | 20 minutes | 55 min |
| Q5: Planning creative writing | 5 minutes | 60 min |
| Q5: Writing | 35 minutes | 95 min |
| Q5: Proofreading | 5 minutes | 100 min |
| Buffer / review | 5 minutes | 105 min |
| Activity | Time | Running Total |
|---|---|---|
| Read Source A and Source B carefully | 12 minutes | 12 min |
| Q1: True statements (4 marks) | 5 minutes | 17 min |
| Q2: Summary (8 marks) | 10 minutes | 27 min |
| Q3: Language analysis (12 marks) | 12 minutes | 39 min |
| Q4: Compare viewpoints (16 marks) | 18 minutes | 57 min |
| Q5: Planning transactional writing | 5 minutes | 62 min |
| Q5: Writing | 33 minutes | 95 min |
| Q5: Proofreading | 5 minutes | 100 min |
| Buffer / review | 5 minutes | 105 min |
Exam Tip: The golden rule of timing is 1 mark ≈ 1 minute for reading questions (after reading time). For the writing question, allocate the full 45 minutes regardless. If you are running short on time, never sacrifice the writing question — it is worth half the paper.
Understanding how marks are distributed across questions helps you prioritise:
| Question | Marks | % of Paper | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4 | 5% | Low (quick marks) |
| Q2 | 8 | 10% | Medium |
| Q3 | 8 | 10% | Medium |
| Q4 | 20 | 25% | High |
| Q5 | 40 | 50% | Very High |
| Question | Marks | % of Paper | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4 | 5% | Low (quick marks) |
| Q2 | 8 | 10% | Medium |
| Q3 | 12 | 15% | Medium-High |
| Q4 | 16 | 20% | High |
| Q5 | 40 | 50% | Very High |
Exam Tip: On both papers, Q5 (the writing question) is worth exactly half the marks. This means your writing skill is as important as your reading skill. Many students neglect writing practice in their revision — do not make this mistake.
Before you answer any questions, you MUST read the source material carefully. Rushing through the text is one of the most common reasons students lose marks.
Exam Tip: Investing 10–12 minutes in reading pays dividends across ALL reading questions. Students who rush their reading and dive straight into answering typically produce weaker, less detailed analysis.