You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The sociology of education asks fundamental questions: Why does education exist? Whose interests does it serve? Is it a force for social cohesion and meritocracy, or a mechanism of social reproduction and inequality? The AQA specification requires you to understand and evaluate functionalist, Marxist, New Right, and postmodernist perspectives on the role and purpose of education. Each offers a different answer to these questions, and each has distinctive strengths and weaknesses.
Key Definition: Education refers to the formal process of teaching and learning that takes place in institutions such as schools, colleges, and universities, as well as informal learning within the family and wider society.
Functionalism is a consensus theory that sees society as a system of interconnected parts, each performing a function that contributes to the stability and smooth running of the whole. Education, from this perspective, is a vital institution that performs several essential functions for both individuals and society.
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) identified two main functions of education:
Creating social solidarity: Education transmits society's shared culture, norms, and values from one generation to the next. This creates a sense of belonging and commitment to the wider social group. Durkheim argued that without shared values, social life would be impossible because each individual would pursue their own selfish desires. Schools act as a "society in miniature," preparing children for life in the wider world by teaching them to cooperate with people who are neither family nor friends. Subjects such as history and citizenship help pupils feel part of a shared heritage and community.
Teaching specialist skills: In advanced industrial societies, production requires a complex division of labour. Education equips individuals with the specialist knowledge and skills needed to play their part in the social division of labour. For example, science and technology education provides the skilled workforce that a modern economy demands.
Key Definition: Social solidarity is the feeling of belonging to a community and sharing its values, norms, and beliefs. For Durkheim, education is the primary institution responsible for creating this in modern societies.
Talcott Parsons (1961) developed Durkheim's ideas further. He saw the school as the focal socialising agency in modern society, acting as a bridge between the family and wider society. Within the family, a child is judged by particularistic standards — they are treated as special and their status is ascribed (given at birth). In contrast, wider society judges individuals by universalistic standards — the same rules apply to everyone and status is achieved through effort and ability.
School prepares children for this transition by treating every pupil according to the same rules and evaluating them all against the same objective criteria (examinations, grades). This instils two key values:
Parsons therefore saw education as a meritocratic institution. It sifts and sorts people according to their ability and effort, legitimately allocating them to appropriate roles in the social division of labour.
Key Definition: Meritocracy is a system in which rewards and positions are allocated on the basis of individual talent and effort, rather than on inherited wealth, social background, or other ascribed characteristics.
Davis and Moore (1945) argued that social inequality is both inevitable and functional. Not all roles in society are equally important, and not everyone is equally talented. Education performs the function of role allocation — it acts as a filtering device, sifting and sorting individuals according to their abilities and channelling them into the roles that best match their talents.
The most important roles in society (e.g., surgeons, engineers) carry the highest rewards because they require the most talent and the longest training. Education identifies the most able individuals through examinations and qualifications and ensures that the most functionally important positions are filled by the most qualified people.
| Functionalist Theorist | Key Concept | Core Argument |
|---|---|---|
| Durkheim | Social solidarity / Specialist skills | Education transmits shared values and provides the skilled workforce society needs |
| Parsons | Meritocracy / Bridge | School bridges family and society by applying universalistic standards and rewarding achievement |
| Davis & Moore | Role allocation | Education sifts and sorts individuals into roles suited to their ability |
Strengths:
Limitations:
Marxism is a conflict theory that sees education as serving the interests of the capitalist ruling class (the bourgeoisie), not the interests of society as a whole. Education reproduces class inequality and legitimates it by producing ideologies that disguise its true nature.
Louis Althusser (1971) argued that the state maintains the power of the capitalist class through two mechanisms:
Education is the most important ISA because it has a captive audience of young people for years during their most formative period. It performs two functions:
Bowles and Gintis (1976), in their study Schooling in Capitalist America, argued that capitalist education is not meritocratic. Analysing data from 237 New York high school students, they found that academic success was related not to measured IQ but to personality traits such as obedience, discipline, and dependability. The most successful students were those most willing to conform. This finding contradicts the functionalist claim that education rewards talent.
Bowles and Gintis developed the concept of the correspondence principle: there is a close correspondence (similarity) between the social relationships of production in the workplace and the social relationships of education. In other words, school mirrors work:
| School | Work |
|---|---|
| Hierarchy of authority (headteacher > teachers > pupils) | Hierarchy of authority (managers > supervisors > workers) |
| Extrinsic motivation (grades, qualifications) | Extrinsic motivation (wages) |
| Fragmentation of knowledge into subjects | Fragmentation of work into repetitive tasks |
| Competition between pupils | Competition between workers |
| Lack of control over curriculum | Lack of control over production |
This correspondence is achieved through the hidden curriculum — the lessons learned through the everyday experience of attending school, rather than through the formal content of lessons. Pupils learn to accept hierarchy, to be motivated by external rewards, to compete against each other, and to accept boredom and routine — all qualities needed in the future workforce.
Key Definition: The hidden curriculum refers to the norms, values, and behaviours that pupils learn informally through the experience of schooling, rather than through the explicit content of lessons. For Marxists, it teaches conformity and acceptance of capitalism.
Strengths:
Limitations:
The New Right is a conservative political perspective that emerged in the 1980s. Like functionalists, the New Right believe that education should be meritocratic and should socialise pupils into shared values. However, they argue that the state-run education system has failed to achieve these goals because it is a state monopoly and is therefore inefficient, wasteful, and unresponsive to the needs of its consumers (parents and employers).
Chubb and Moe (1990) argued that the American state education system had failed for two reasons:
Their solution was marketisation — introducing market forces (competition, choice, and consumer sovereignty) into education. They proposed a voucher system in which each family would receive a voucher to spend at the school of their choice. Schools would then have to compete for pupils (and the funding they bring), driving up standards. Poorly performing schools would lose pupils and eventually close, while successful schools would expand.
Strengths:
Limitations:
Postmodernists argue that both functionalist and Marxist theories of education are metanarratives — grand theories that claim to explain the whole of society but are no longer valid in the diverse, fragmented, postmodern world.
Postmodernists such as Usher and Edwards (1994) argue that education is linked to the modernist project of progress through reason and science. In postmodern society, there is no single truth or way of knowing. Education should therefore be diverse and flexible, celebrating difference rather than imposing a single national identity or set of values.
However, postmodernist theory is itself criticised for being vague and for underestimating the continuing reality of class, gender, and ethnic inequalities in education. If education is merely about celebrating diversity, it may ignore the structural barriers that prevent some groups from achieving.
| Perspective | View of Education | Key Theorists | Core Criticism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functionalism | Positive — promotes solidarity, meritocracy, role allocation | Durkheim, Parsons, Davis & Moore | Ignores inequality; assumes consensus |
| Marxism | Negative — reproduces and legitimates class inequality | Althusser, Bowles & Gintis | Deterministic; ignores resistance and social mobility |
| New Right | Critical of state education — favours marketisation | Chubb & Moe | Marketisation increases inequality |
| Postmodernism | Education reflects outdated modernist values | Usher & Edwards | Vague; ignores structural inequality |
Exam Tip: A 30-mark essay on the role of education will require you to compare perspectives. Use the contrasts between functionalism and Marxism as the backbone of your answer, and bring in the New Right and postmodernism for extra marks. Always include specific studies and evaluation points — examiners reward depth and the ability to weigh up competing arguments.