You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
Functionalism is a consensus perspective that views society as a system of interrelated parts, each performing a function to maintain social stability. Functionalists ask not whether religious beliefs are true or false, but what function religion performs for individuals and society as a whole. The key thinkers you must know for this topic are Durkheim, Malinowski, Parsons, and Bellah.
Key Definition: Functionalism is a structural-consensus theory that sees religion as a social institution performing essential functions for individuals and society, including social solidarity, value consensus, and meaning in the face of uncertainty.
Émile Durkheim is the foundational functionalist theorist of religion. His study of the Arunta Aboriginal Australian clan formed the basis of his argument that religion is fundamentally a social rather than supernatural phenomenon. Durkheim believed that by studying religion in its simplest, most elementary form, he could uncover the essential features shared by all religions.
Durkheim argued that the central feature of all religions is a fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane. Sacred objects, places, and rituals are set apart from ordinary, everyday (profane) life and are treated with awe, reverence, and respect. The profane refers to the mundane, routine aspects of daily existence.
What makes something sacred is not an inherent quality of the object itself but rather the meaning that a community collectively attaches to it. A wooden cross, for example, is profane as a piece of timber but sacred as a symbol of Christianity. This distinction is socially constructed and maintained through collective rituals and shared beliefs.
Exam Tip: Be precise about the sacred/profane distinction. The sacred is not simply "religious" — it is anything set apart by a community and surrounded by prohibitions and rituals. This could include national flags, war memorials, or other secular objects.
Durkheim studied totemism among the Arunta, who worshipped a totem — typically an animal or plant that served as the emblem of the clan. The totem was treated as sacred: it was carved into objects, painted on bodies during ceremonies, and surrounded by ritual prohibitions.
Durkheim argued that when clan members worship the totem, they are not really worshipping an animal or plant. Instead, they are worshipping society itself. The totem is a symbol that represents the clan — its identity, its values, its collective existence. By worshipping the totem, individuals are reinforcing their sense of belonging to something greater than themselves.
This insight is central to Durkheim's entire theory: religion is society worshipping itself. The power that believers attribute to God or the sacred is, in reality, the power of society over the individual. Religious rituals generate intense emotional energy — what Durkheim called collective effervescence — that binds individuals together and reinforces social solidarity.
The collective conscience is the shared set of norms, values, beliefs, and moral attitudes that operates as a unifying force within society. Durkheim argued that religion is the primary institution through which the collective conscience is expressed, reinforced, and transmitted from one generation to the next.
Through participation in religious rituals and ceremonies, individuals reaffirm their commitment to the shared values of the group. The collective conscience provides individuals with a sense of belonging and purpose, and it constrains behaviour by defining what is morally acceptable and unacceptable.
Key Definition: Collective conscience refers to the shared beliefs, ideas, and moral attitudes that bind members of a society together and create a sense of social unity.
Durkheim also argued that religion performs important cognitive functions. Religious categories of thought — concepts of time, space, causality, and classification — provide the basic conceptual framework that makes rational thinking possible. In this sense, religion is the origin of human thought itself. Categories such as higher and lower, left and right, sacred and profane provided the first systems for classifying and making sense of the world.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Bronislaw Malinowski (1954) agreed with Durkheim that religion promotes social solidarity but argued that it does so by helping individuals cope with emotional stress that would otherwise threaten social cohesion. Malinowski identified two specific types of situation in which religion performs this psychological function.
Malinowski studied the Trobriand Islanders of the Western Pacific and observed that they used magic and religious rituals in situations of uncertainty and uncontrollable danger. When islanders fished in the calm, safe waters of the lagoon, they did not perform any rituals — the outcome was predictable and controllable. However, when they fished in the open ocean, where storms and other dangers were unpredictable and potentially fatal, they performed elaborate magical rituals before setting out.
Malinowski concluded that religion and magic function to reduce anxiety in situations where the outcome is uncertain and beyond human control. By performing rituals, individuals gain a sense of agency and confidence, which enables them to face dangerous situations more effectively.
Malinowski also argued that religion helps people cope with life crises — events such as birth, puberty, marriage, and death that disrupt normal social life and generate intense emotional responses. Funeral rituals, for example, help the bereaved process grief, reaffirm the solidarity of the community, and reassert the belief that life has meaning even in the face of death.
Without religious rituals to manage these crises, the intense emotions they generate could threaten social cohesion. Religion provides a framework for understanding and coping with the unpredictable, the frightening, and the inexplicable.
Talcott Parsons (1967) identified two essential functions of religion in modern societies.
Parsons argued that religion provides the ultimate justification for a society's core values. In the United States, for example, the values of individualism, meritocracy, and self-discipline are rooted in the Protestant tradition. By sacralising these values — presenting them as divinely ordained — religion makes them appear natural, inevitable, and unchallengeable. This promotes value consensus and social order.
Parsons argued that religion answers ultimate questions — questions about the meaning of life, the purpose of suffering, and what happens after death. Events such as premature death, natural disasters, and unjust suffering pose a fundamental challenge to social stability because they threaten to undermine people's faith in the fairness and meaningfulness of the social order.
Religion addresses these threats by providing theodicies — explanations of why bad things happen (e.g., "God has a plan," "suffering is a test of faith"). Without such explanations, anomie and social disorder could result.
Robert Bellah (1967) addressed a key weakness of functionalist theory: in large, diverse societies like the United States, no single religion commands universal allegiance. How, then, can religion perform the function of social solidarity?
Bellah's answer was civil religion — a set of beliefs, symbols, and rituals that sacralise the American nation itself, existing alongside (and above) the many individual churches and denominations. Civil religion is not Christianity or any specific faith; it is a quasi-religious loyalty to the nation-state.