You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The period of Reconstruction (1865–1877) represents one of the most contested eras in American history. Following the Union's victory in the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, the nation faced profound questions: on what terms would the former Confederate states rejoin the Union, and what would freedom mean for four million formerly enslaved people? The answers to these questions shaped the trajectory of American race relations for over a century.
Key Definition: Reconstruction refers to the period (1865–1877) during which the federal government attempted to reintegrate the former Confederate states into the Union and to define the status and rights of freed African Americans.
Even before the war ended, President Abraham Lincoln had begun developing a plan for reunification. His Ten Percent Plan (1863) proposed that a Confederate state could be readmitted once ten per cent of its 1860 voters took an oath of loyalty to the Union and accepted emancipation. Lincoln's approach was characterised by pragmatism and a desire for a swift reconciliation.
However, Radical Republicans in Congress, led by figures such as Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, believed Lincoln's plan was far too lenient. They pushed through the Wade-Davis Bill (1864), which required a majority of a state's white male citizens to swear loyalty and demanded stronger guarantees for Black civil rights. Lincoln pocket-vetoed this bill, setting up a fundamental tension between executive and legislative visions of Reconstruction.
Exam Tip: When evaluating Reconstruction, always consider the tension between presidential and congressional approaches. Examiners reward answers that analyse competing visions rather than treating Reconstruction as a single policy.
Lincoln's assassination on 14 April 1865 brought Vice President Andrew Johnson to power — a man profoundly ill-suited to the challenges ahead. A War Democrat from Tennessee, Johnson was a white supremacist who had no interest in securing rights for freed people.
Johnson's Presidential Reconstruction (1865–1867) was extraordinarily lenient towards the former Confederacy:
| Policy | Detail |
|---|---|
| Amnesty | Pardoned most Confederates who took an oath of loyalty; personally pardoned wealthy planters |
| State conventions | Required Southern states to ratify the 13th Amendment and repudiate Confederate debts, but imposed no requirements for Black suffrage |
| Land restoration | Reversed wartime land redistribution, returning confiscated plantations to former owners |
| Vetoes | Vetoed the Freedmen's Bureau extension and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 |
Johnson's approach emboldened the former Confederate elite. Southern state legislatures passed Black Codes — laws that severely restricted the freedom of African Americans, forcing them into labour contracts, restricting their movement, and denying them the right to vote, serve on juries, or testify against white people in court.
Key Definition: Black Codes were laws passed by Southern states in 1865–1866 that restricted the rights and freedoms of African Americans, effectively recreating many conditions of slavery.
The historian Eric Foner has argued that Johnson's Reconstruction represented a "counter-revolution" that sought to preserve as much of the antebellum racial hierarchy as possible. Kenneth Stampp similarly concluded that presidential Reconstruction was a "squandered opportunity" that allowed the old planter class to reassert its dominance.
The most enduring legacy of Reconstruction was the passage of three constitutional amendments that fundamentally redefined American citizenship:
| Amendment | Year Ratified | Key Provisions |
|---|---|---|
| 13th Amendment | 1865 | Abolished slavery and involuntary servitude throughout the United States |
| 14th Amendment | 1868 | Granted citizenship to all persons born in the US; guaranteed equal protection under the law; due process clause |
| 15th Amendment | 1870 | Prohibited denial of suffrage based on race, colour, or previous condition of servitude |
These amendments represented a revolutionary expansion of federal power and a redefinition of the relationship between the national government and the states. W.E.B. Du Bois, in his landmark work Black Reconstruction in America (1935), described this as an attempt at "abolition-democracy" — a genuine effort to create a multiracial democratic society.
However, the amendments contained significant limitations. The 13th Amendment's exception clause ("except as a punishment for crime") would later be exploited through convict leasing. The 14th Amendment did not explicitly guarantee voting rights. The 15th Amendment did not prohibit literacy tests, poll taxes, or other mechanisms that could be used to disenfranchise Black voters without explicitly mentioning race.
Exam Tip: When assessing the Reconstruction Amendments, consider both their revolutionary potential and their practical limitations. The strongest answers will evaluate whether the amendments' weaknesses were inherent in the text or resulted from subsequent failures of enforcement.
Frustrated by Johnson's obstruction, the Republican-dominated Congress seized control of Reconstruction in 1867. The Reconstruction Acts divided the former Confederacy (except Tennessee) into five military districts, required new state constitutions guaranteeing Black male suffrage, and mandated ratification of the 14th Amendment as a condition of readmission.
Congressional anger at Johnson culminated in his impeachment in February 1868. The immediate cause was Johnson's violation of the Tenure of Office Act by dismissing Secretary of War Edwin Stanton. The House voted to impeach, but the Senate fell one vote short of the two-thirds majority needed for conviction. Nevertheless, Johnson's power was effectively broken.
The most remarkable feature of Radical Reconstruction was the unprecedented political participation of African Americans in the South:
Foner has emphasised that Black political participation during Reconstruction was not merely symbolic but represented a genuine attempt at democratic governance. The Reconstruction governments, despite being derided as corrupt by contemporary critics and later by the Dunning School of historians, actually achieved significant reforms in public education, infrastructure, and legal equality.
Key Definition: The Dunning School refers to a group of early twentieth-century historians, led by William Archibald Dunning, who portrayed Reconstruction as a period of misgovernment by corrupt carpetbaggers, scalawags, and incompetent freedmen. This interpretation dominated until challenged by revisionists in the mid-twentieth century.
The Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands (commonly known as the Freedmen's Bureau) was established in March 1865 to assist formerly enslaved people in their transition to freedom.
| Function | Achievement | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Education | Established over 4,000 schools; laid foundations for Black colleges including Howard and Fisk Universities | Chronically underfunded; could not overcome white resistance |
| Labour contracts | Negotiated labour contracts between freedpeople and employers | Often favoured employers; reinforced plantation labour patterns |
| Legal protection | Established courts to adjudicate disputes involving freedpeople | Limited jurisdiction; overruled by Johnson's pardons |
| Land redistribution | General Sherman's Special Field Order No. 15 allocated "forty acres and a mule" | Johnson reversed this policy; most land returned to former owners |
The failure of land reform was, in Du Bois's analysis, the critical failure of Reconstruction. Without economic independence, political rights remained precarious. The historian Claude Oubre has documented how the promise of "forty acres and a mule" — the most radical proposal of Reconstruction — was systematically undermined by Johnson's restoration policies.
Resistance to Reconstruction took violent form through organisations such as the Ku Klux Klan (founded in Pulaski, Tennessee, in 1866), the White League, and the Red Shirts. These groups used terrorism — including murder, arson, whipping, and intimidation — to suppress Black political participation and restore white supremacy.
The scale of violence was staggering. The Colfax Massacre (1873) in Louisiana saw the murder of approximately 150 African Americans. The Hamburg Massacre (1876) in South Carolina similarly targeted Black militia members and voters. Thousands of individual murders went unprosecuted.
Congress responded with the Enforcement Acts (1870–1871), including the Ku Klux Klan Act, which authorised the president to use military force against terrorist organisations. Under President Ulysses S. Grant, federal prosecution temporarily suppressed Klan activity in the early 1870s, but enforcement waned as Northern commitment to Reconstruction faded.
The historian George Rable has argued that this violence constituted a "counterrevolution of property" — an organised campaign by the planter class to reassert economic and political control. Allen Trelease documented the systematic nature of Klan violence in his study White Terror (1971), demonstrating that it was not random but strategically targeted at Republican officeholders and politically active African Americans.
The disputed presidential election of 1876 between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel Tilden led to the Compromise of 1877. In exchange for Southern Democratic acceptance of Hayes's presidency, the federal government agreed to withdraw the remaining troops from the South, effectively ending Reconstruction.
| Factor in Reconstruction's End | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Northern fatigue | Decades of sectional conflict left Northern voters weary of Southern affairs |
| Economic depression | The Panic of 1873 shifted Northern attention to economic concerns |
| Liberal Republican movement | Reformers within the GOP prioritised civil service reform over racial justice |
| Supreme Court decisions | Rulings in the Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) and United States v. Cruikshank (1876) narrowed the scope of the 14th Amendment |
| White supremacist violence | Systematic terrorism undermined Republican governance in the South |
The interpretation of Reconstruction has undergone dramatic revision over the past century:
| Interpretation | Key Historians | Core Argument |
|---|---|---|
| Dunning School (early 20th century) | William Dunning, Claude Bowers | Reconstruction was a tragic era of misgovernment; freedmen were unfit for political participation |
| Revisionist (mid-20th century) | Kenneth Stampp, John Hope Franklin | Reconstruction was a genuine, if flawed, attempt at racial democracy |
| Post-revisionist (late 20th century) | Eric Foner | Reconstruction was an "unfinished revolution" — its achievements were real but its failure left a legacy of racial inequality |
| Du Bois tradition | W.E.B. Du Bois | Reconstruction represented a revolutionary moment of "abolition-democracy" that was destroyed by a counter-revolution of property |
Foner's synthesis, Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution (1988), remains the standard work. He argues that Reconstruction's achievements — the constitutional amendments, public education, Black political participation — were genuine and significant, but that the failure to redistribute land and the withdrawal of federal commitment ultimately doomed the experiment.
Exam Tip: The question "How far did Reconstruction achieve its goals?" requires you to define what those goals were (which varied by faction), assess achievements against them, and reach a substantiated judgement. The strongest answers will acknowledge that Reconstruction's "failure" was not inevitable but the result of specific political choices and power dynamics.
Reconstruction represented the most ambitious attempt at racial democracy in American history before the Civil Rights Movement. Its achievements — abolition, citizenship, suffrage, public education — were genuine and significant. Its failures — the absence of land reform, the persistence of white supremacist violence, the withdrawal of federal commitment — cast a long shadow over American history. Understanding Reconstruction is essential for comprehending the patterns of racial inequality that persisted well into the twentieth century.
| Key Concept | Detail |
|---|---|
| Presidential Reconstruction | Johnson's lenient approach; Black Codes; restoration of planter class |
| Congressional/Radical Reconstruction | Military districts; Black suffrage; 14th Amendment required |
| Constitutional legacy | 13th, 14th, 15th Amendments transformed American citizenship |
| Economic failure | No systematic land redistribution; sharecropping replaced slavery |
| Political achievement | Over 2,000 Black officeholders; progressive state legislation |
| Violent resistance | KKK, White League, Red Shirts; systematic terrorism |
| End of Reconstruction | Compromise of 1877; Northern fatigue; Supreme Court retreat |