You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The Conservative victory in the October 1951 general election returned Winston Churchill to Downing Street — but the Britain he governed was radically different from the one he had led through the Second World War. The Attlee governments of 1945–51 had constructed a welfare state and a mixed economy that fundamentally reshaped the relationship between state and citizen. The central question for historians is whether the Conservatives accepted the Attlee settlement, creating a genuine post-war consensus, or whether apparent continuity masked deeper ideological tensions.
| Key Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Election | 25 October 1951 — Conservatives won 321 seats to Labour's 295, despite Labour winning more total votes (48.8% to 48.0%). The electoral system's bias towards rural constituencies delivered a Conservative majority of 17. |
| Churchill's age | 76 at the time of the election — already suffering from poor health, including a minor stroke in 1949 |
| Cabinet | Key figures included R.A. Butler (Chancellor), Anthony Eden (Foreign Secretary), Harold Macmillan (Housing), and Lord Woolton (party chairman who had modernised Conservative organisation) |
| Industrial Charter (1947) | The Conservatives had already signalled acceptance of the mixed economy in their 1947 Industrial Charter, drafted largely by Butler and Macmillan |
The idea of a post-war consensus — sometimes called "Butskellism" (a portmanteau of Butler and the Labour Chancellor Hugh Gaitskell) — suggests that both parties broadly agreed on:
Historiographical Debate: The concept of consensus has been fiercely debated. Paul Addison (The Road to 1945, 1975) argued that the wartime coalition created a genuine social democratic consensus that lasted until the 1970s. Ben Pimlott challenged this fundamentally in his 1988 article "The Myth of Consensus," arguing that the apparent agreement masked real policy disagreements, and that contemporaries did not perceive themselves as part of a consensus. Harriet Jones and Dennis Kavanagh (The Myth of Consensus, 1996) offered a nuanced middle ground: there were areas of genuine agreement (the NHS, full employment) but also significant differences (housing policy, attitudes to nationalisation, educational philosophy).
Harold Macmillan, as Minister of Housing, achieved the target of building 300,000 houses per year by 1953 — a pledge that had been central to the Conservative election campaign. This was achieved partly through:
Significance: Macmillan's success at Housing established his reputation as a dynamic administrator and launched his path to the premiership. The shift towards private housebuilding foreshadowed later Conservative emphasis on a "property-owning democracy."
The Conservatives broadly maintained the welfare state but introduced some changes:
| Policy Area | Action |
|---|---|
| NHS | Retained but introduced prescription charges (1952) — a policy that Labour's Bevan and Wilson had resigned over when Gaitskell first proposed charges in 1951 |
| Education | Maintained the tripartite system established by the 1944 Butler Education Act (grammar schools, secondary moderns, technical schools), though technical schools were rarely built |
| National Insurance | Maintained Beveridge-era benefits but real values were not always protected against inflation |
R.A. Butler as Chancellor pursued cautious Keynesian policies:
Churchill suffered a severe stroke on 23 June 1953, which was concealed from the public with the complicity of press barons Lord Beaverbrook and Lord Camrose. He recovered partially but was increasingly incapacitated. He finally resigned on 5 April 1955, succeeded by Anthony Eden.
Eden had served as Foreign Secretary for over a decade (1935–38 under Chamberlain, 1940–45 and 1951–55 under Churchill). He was widely regarded as Churchill's natural successor and won a comfortable majority of 60 seats in the May 1955 general election.
The Suez Crisis was the defining event of Eden's premiership and a watershed in post-war British history:
| Phase | Events |
|---|---|
| Background | Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal Company on 26 July 1956, after the US and Britain withdrew funding for the Aswan High Dam |
| Collusion | Britain, France, and Israel secretly agreed the Protocol of Sèvres (24 October 1956): Israel would attack Egypt, and Britain and France would intervene as "peacekeepers" to separate the combatants and regain control of the Canal |
| Military action | Israel invaded on 29 October; Anglo-French forces began bombing on 31 October and landed paratroopers on 5 November |
| US opposition | President Eisenhower was furious — he was not consulted and the invasion coincided with the Hungarian uprising, undermining Western moral authority. The US refused to support sterling, threatening a financial crisis. |
| Withdrawal | Faced with US financial pressure, a run on the pound, and a UN General Assembly resolution demanding withdrawal, Britain accepted a ceasefire on 6 November |
| Resignation | Eden resigned on 9 January 1957, citing ill health, though the political damage from Suez made his position untenable |
Historiographical Debate: Keith Kyle (Suez, 1991) provided the definitive narrative account, demonstrating the extent of Anglo-French-Israeli collusion and the dishonesty of Eden's public statements. W. Roger Louis and Roger Owen emphasised Suez as the end of Britain's imperial pretensions. David Carlton (Britain and the Suez Crisis, 1988) argued that Eden was not merely incompetent but mentally unstable, affected by botched bile-duct surgery and amphetamine use. More recently, historians have debated whether Suez was truly the watershed it appeared — Britain maintained significant global commitments well into the 1960s, and the "East of Suez" withdrawal did not occur until 1968.
| Theme | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Consensus | The 1951–57 period appears to support the consensus thesis — the Conservatives maintained the welfare state, full employment, and the mixed economy |
| Decline | Suez exposed the limits of British power and the dependence on American goodwill |
| Leadership | Both Churchill and Eden were products of the pre-war world, struggling to adapt to post-war realities |
| Economy | The 1950s saw rising living standards but also the beginnings of "stop-go" economic management that would plague subsequent governments |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1951 | Conservatives win general election; Churchill PM |
| 1952 | NHS prescription charges introduced |
| 1953 | Churchill suffers stroke (concealed); Macmillan achieves 300,000 houses target |
| 1955 | Eden becomes PM; Conservatives win general election; Butler's election-bribe budget |
| 1956 | Suez Crisis (July–November) |
| 1957 | Eden resigns (January); Macmillan becomes PM |
Sample question: "The period 1951–57 demonstrates that post-war consensus was a reality, not a myth." Assess the validity of this view.
Approach: