You are viewing a free preview of this lesson.
Subscribe to unlock all 10 lessons in this course and every other course on LearningBro.
The unseen poetry section of AQA A-Level English Literature (Paper 1, Section B) is, for many students, the most daunting part of the exam. You are presented with two poems you have never read before and asked to write a comparative analysis. There is no set text to revise, no critical material to memorise, no contextual knowledge to deploy. Instead, the examiner is testing something arguably more fundamental: your ability to read a poem closely, think independently, and articulate a response under pressure.
This lesson establishes the strategies and habits of mind that will underpin every unseen poetry response you write.
The single most important thing you can do when you turn to the unseen poetry question is read the poem through at least twice before you begin to write anything.
On the first reading, you are not looking for techniques. You are trying to answer the most basic questions:
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| What is this poem about? | Establishing subject matter gives you an anchor for everything that follows |
| Who is speaking? | Is there a first-person speaker? A persona? An omniscient voice? |
| What is the situation? | Is the speaker remembering? Observing? Addressing someone? Arguing? |
| What is the dominant feeling or tone? | Melancholy? Anger? Tenderness? Ambivalence? |
| Does anything change? | Does the tone shift? Does the speaker arrive at a new understanding? |
Exam Tip (AO1): Examiners consistently report that the weakest responses are those that dive straight into spotting techniques without first establishing what the poem is actually saying. A coherent reading of meaning is the foundation of everything — without it, your analysis of language and form will be directionless.
On the second reading, you begin to notice how the poem achieves its effects. This is when you start to annotate.
You have approximately one hour for the comparative essay (two poems). Spending 5–7 minutes reading and annotating each poem is time well invested, not time wasted.
| Element | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Title | Does it establish subject, tone, or perspective? Does the poem complicate or contradict its title? |
| Opening and closing lines | How does the poem begin and end? Is there a sense of arrival, resolution, or deliberate irresolution? |
| Striking images or phrases | Circle or underline language that seems especially vivid, unusual, or loaded |
| Patterns and repetitions | Repeated words, phrases, images, or sounds — these are almost always significant |
| Shifts and turns | Mark any point where the tone, perspective, or argument changes direction |
| Line breaks and stanza breaks | Are they regular or irregular? Do they reinforce or disrupt the sense of the words? |
| Punctuation | Dashes, ellipses, exclamation marks, questions — all contribute to pace and tone |
Many students find it helpful to develop a consistent shorthand:
Key Principle: Annotation is thinking made visible. The act of marking the text forces you to slow down and engage with specific words rather than skimming for a general impression.
The distinction between subject and theme is crucial at A-Level:
For example, a poem might have as its subject a man watching his daughter leave home for university. Its themes might include the passage of time, the tension between protectiveness and letting go, and the inadequacy of language to express love.
At A-Level, examiners expect you to move beyond subject to theme. A response that says "this poem is about a man watching his daughter leave" is descriptive. A response that says "the poem explores the paradox of parental love — the desire to hold on and the necessity of release" is analytical.
Tone is one of the most important — and most frequently misjudged — elements of poetry. It refers to the attitude the speaker takes towards their subject, their audience, or themselves.
| Tone | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Elegiac | Sorrowful, reflective, often mourning a loss; measured, often musical language |
| Celebratory | Joyful, expansive, often using exclamation and vivid imagery |
| Ironic | Saying one thing while meaning another; often a gap between surface and depth |
| Ambivalent | Mixed feelings; the speaker is pulled in two directions at once |
| Meditative | Thoughtful, ruminative; the poem thinks its way through a problem |
| Urgent | Driven, perhaps breathless; short sentences, imperative verbs, enjambment |
| Detached | Cool, observational, withholding emotion |
| Bitter | Sharp, accusatory, often directed at a person, institution, or situation |
Common Mistake: Students often identify tone in a single word and leave it at that: "The tone is sad." This is insufficient. You need to show how the tone is created through specific choices of language, imagery, rhythm, and form. Moreover, tone in good poetry is rarely monolithic — it shifts, modulates, and contradicts itself.
It is entirely natural to feel anxious when confronted with an unfamiliar poem. The following principles may help:
There is no single correct reading. The examiner is not looking for a pre-determined interpretation. They want to see you thinking carefully and supporting your ideas with evidence from the text.
You do not need to understand everything. If a poem contains an image or reference you do not recognise, work around it. Use what you do understand to build your reading.
Trust your instincts, then test them. If the poem feels melancholy, ask yourself why it feels that way. What specific words, rhythms, or images are creating that impression? Your initial response is the starting point for analysis, not the end of it.
The poem is self-contained. Unlike the set text sections, you are not expected to bring in contextual knowledge or critical opinions. Everything you need is on the page in front of you.
Quality over quantity. A focused analysis of four or five well-chosen points, explored in depth, will always score higher than a hurried survey of ten superficial observations.
AO1 Reminder: The mark scheme rewards "informed personal response" and the ability to "use literary critical concepts and terminology with accuracy." This means your own thinking, expressed precisely, using the language of literary analysis. It does not mean regurgitating a checklist of techniques.
Here is a step-by-step method you can practise and refine:
| Step | Action | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Read the poem through once without annotating | 1–2 min |
| 2 | Read again, annotating as you go | 3–4 min |
| 3 | Identify 4–5 key points (theme, tone, significant techniques, shifts, form) | 2 min |
| 4 | Consider how these points connect to Poem 2 (after reading both) | 2 min |
This gives you approximately 8–10 minutes of reading and thinking before you write. The remaining 50 minutes should be spent writing your comparative essay.
The unseen poetry question rewards a particular kind of reading:
The skills you develop in this section of the paper are, in many ways, the purest form of literary criticism. You are reading a poem on its own terms, with nothing to rely on but your own intelligence and sensitivity. That is something to embrace, not to fear.